DARTMOUTH SQUARE AND THE CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD NOEL O'GARA BY COURT APPOINTED OFFICIALS AND DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL, AIDED AND ABETTED BY THREE HIGH COURT JUDGES WHO COLLUDED IN THE CONSPIRACY

 

 

 

 

HOW DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL CONSPIRED WITH A COURT LIQUIDATOR AND UNDER THE COVER OF THE HIGH COURT ATTEMPTED TO ROB ME OF MY PROPERTY.

DARTMOUTH SQUARE IS PRIVATE PROPERTY SIMILAR TO EVERY PRIVATE PROPERTY IN IRELAND

PROPERTY RIGHTS OF ALL CITIZENS ARE ENSHRINED IN OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE COURTS ARE DUTY BOUND TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS OF THE STATE AND THEIR RIGHTS.

 

A COURT APPOINTED LIQUIDATOR HAS ENGAGED IN FRAUD TO ROB ME OF MY LAND KNOWN AS DARTMOUTH SQUARE AND TO DELIVER IT TO DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL FOR A FRACTION OF ITS VALUE..

 

THREE HIGH COURT JUDGES, MARY LAFFOY, MARY FINLAY-GEOGHEGAN AND PETER CHARLETON FAILED TO PROTECT ME AND HAVE GIVEN THEIR ACTIVE SUPPORT TO THIS CRIME AND REFUSED TO REFER THE EVIDENCE TO A JURY. EACH JUDGE WAS SUPPORTING THE PREVIOUS JUDGE AND VIOLATED THEIR OATH OF OFFICE IN THE PROCESS AS THEY PERVERTED THE COURSE OF JUSTICE IN THEIR ACTIONS.

THEY PRESENT MY LAND AS A PUBLIC PARK AND PART OF THE FABRIC OF DUBLIN CITY, BUT IT WAS A PRIVATE SCHOOL SPORTS GROUND FOR SEVERAL DECADES AND WAS OPEN AS A PUBLIC PARK FOR JUST TEN YEARS. IT WAS ALWAYS PRIVATE PROPERTY.

To make the fraud look like it was above board, the Liquidator arranged for Allsop's to auction it in their sale on 4th December and they set a reserve price of 140,000 Euros on this very valuable block of freehold land.

My company Marble and Granite Tiles Ltd was the registered owner of the land and it was put into liquidation by the Council to enforce a debt of 43,000 Euros for accumulated legal fees which were deliberately run up by them in multiple court actions to prevent me from parking cars, putting a mobile home in place for a caretaker, pitching a tent or selling tiles or anything on that land. They even put a tree preservation order on it and an order that it was a special area of conservation. Every one of these orders violated my constitutional property rights. The land was zoned for sporting and recreation purposes and could even become a private house site.

 

The city council zoning website puts its possible uses as follows and therefore its use was not restricted to that of a mere public park.

Open for Consideration Uses
Car park for recreational purposes, Caravan park
/Camp site (holiday), Community facility, Crèche,
Craft centre/craft shop,Cultural/recreational
building and uses, Golf course and clubhouse,
Kiosk, Tea room.

 

 

 

Councillors Mary Freehill and Oisin Quinn in their efforts to curry favour with the voters of Ranelagh colluded in the conspiracy to defraud me of my land.

http://www.labour.ie/oisinquinn/news/13546593342373026.html

Quinn is no stranger to allegations of abuse of public office and Freehill is living high on the hog of public expenses

http://www.independent.ie/national-news/quinn-nephew-denies-vote-on-city-planning-broke-the-law-2967957.html

 

I had been unable to pay this debt to Dublin City Council because they had failed to compensate me for two properties they had taken from me by Compulsory Purchase Orders and compensation of more than 500,000 Euros was agreed and due payable to me but unpaid by the Council who are unable to pay their own debts and they resorted to legal trickery to delay payment. They had actually closed down my new internet business and evicted me from my shop to get possession of it. They had acquired it together with a row of other shops intending to sell it on with planning permission to a favoured developer at a profit. I had spent the previous two years redeveloping this two storey derelict shop travelling to Dublin from my home in Athlone daily and just when it was almost completed the Council decided to put a CPO on the whole street. Due to the economic downturn they never sold it on and it remains boarded up but I was out of business. Another property stolen from me was sold by them for 125,000 Euros and they have delayed all efforts to pay me for it and even refused to offset the 43,000 debt from that.

The Court appointed officials Tom Murray of Friel Stafford, together with his solicitor Paul Meagher of Meaghers Solicitors were on a mission to defraud me of the value of my land and in order to deliver it back into the hands of Dublin City Council, they set a derisory reserve price with special conditions calculated to deter all outside interest in the land.

In order to be absolutely sure that nobody was going to bid on it, just a few weeks before the auction date they introduced an unusual special condition with Allsop's that any interested party must register before the auction and pay a deposit of 14,000 Euros up front to be allowed to bid. This ensured that on the day of the auction they knew that nobody was going to bid against them and there wasnt a single bid in the auction room when the lot came up for sale. However after the auction Dublin City Council acting in a conspiracy with a few of the local residents who had been pressuring them to acquire it, had it knocked down to themselves at the price of 142,000

 

 

 

 

WOULD YOU SIGN A CONTRACT TO BUY A PROPERTY IF IT STATED THAT

VACANT POSSESSION WAS EXCLUDED?

 

WOULD YOU BUY A PROPERTY IF THE VENDOR INFORMED YOU THAT A FORMER TENANT NOW IN POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY MAY HAVE THE RIGHT TO RENEW HIS EXPIRED LEASE OR OVERHOLD ON IT?

 

These were just two of the special conditions that the official Liquidator put into the conditions of sale of Dartmouth Square with the express purpose to deter any outside interested party from buying the two acre site in the heart of Ranelagh.

TOM MURRAY HAD EARLIER BLACKMAILED MY WIFE AND ME INTO SURRENDERING MY WIFE'S LEASE OF THE LAND BY REPEATED THREATS THAT HE WOULD TAKE COURT ACTION AGAINST HER ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE LEASE WAS CREATED TO DEFRAUD THE COMPANY.

WHEN HE SUCCEEDED WITH THESE THREATS AND WE SURRENDERED THE LEASE SO THAT HE COULD SELL THE LAND FREEHOLD AND WITH VACANT POSSESSION, HE ADMITTED IN A WRITTEN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THAT THERE WAS NO FRAUD.

BUT HE HAD DEFRAUDED US WITH THE THREATENING AND BLACKMAILING POWER OF THE HIGH COURT BEHIND HIM RUN BY JUDGE MARY FINLAY GEOGHEGAN WHO BACKED HIS FRAUDULENT ACTIONS FULLY AND REFUSED MY REQUESTS FOR PROTECTION OF THE COURTS. SHE HAD A DUTY TO QUESTION THIS AGREEMENT WHICH WAS BROUGHT UNDER THE COMPANIES ACTS CITING FRAUD, YET THEY ADMITTED THERE WAS NO FRAUD AND SO SHE COLLUDED IN THAT FRAUD AGAINST US.

 

 

THE LETTER BELOW FROM DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL CONFIRMS THAT BOTH OF THESE CONDITIONS WERE LIES AND FRAUD

 

 

THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS ON THE CONTRACT FOR SALE ON ALLSOP'S WEBSITE READ AS FOLLOWS.

''The vendor is not aware whether Dublin City Council are still in possession and over holding on the expiry of the said lease and the Purchaser shall satisfy himself in relation to this matter and General Condition 21 hereof (vacant possession) is hereby excluded''

 

IN FACT TOM MURRAY HAD GIVEN DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL A CARETAKER'S AGREEMENT AND PUT THEM IN POSSESSION OF THE LAND. HAD HE BEEN ACTING HONESTLY AS A LIQUIDATOR WITH THE BEST INTERESTS OF BOTH SHAREHOLDERS AND CREDITORS, HE WOULD HAVE LOCKED THE GATES AND SECURED IT FOR THE COMING SALE WITH VACANT POSSESSION BEING HANDED OVER AFTER THE SALE.

 

 

On 30th November just a few days before the auction, I brought a motion to the high court of judge Mary Finlay Geoghegan requesting the protection of the court, showing her the evidence of the fraud and claiming that the auction was an attempt to defraud me of the value of the land. She refused to allow me to give sworn evidence and only listened to me from the benches of the court. I demanded that the matter be put before a jury and told her this was evidence of serious crime and fraud and I asked her to stop the auction.

She was then to state that she had not heard any evidence of fraud, having prevented me from giving sworn evidence.

However Michael O'Sullivan the barrister who was spinning the lies on behalf of the Liquidator Tom Murray and his solicitor Paul Meagher then produced this letter dated the same day to judge Finlay Geoghegan and handed me a copy.

THIS LETTER CONFIRMS THAT THE TWO SPECIAL CONDITIONS SUGGESTING THAT THE COUNCIL HAD A RIGHT TO OVERHOLD AND RETAIN POSSESSION AND ALSO THAT VACANT POSSESSION WAS EXCLUDED, WERE LIES AND A FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION OF THE TITLE.

THEY WERE INSERTED TO DETER OUTSIDE INTEREST AND TO ENSURE NOBODY BID AGAINST THEM AT THEIR PREARRANGED ROCK BOTTOM PRICE WHICH WAS MEANT TO COVER THEIR EXPENSES AND TO DEFRAUD ME OF THE TRUE VALUE OF THE LAND.

THE BURLINGTON HOTEL STANDING ON LESS THAN 4 ACRES AND JUST 200 YARDS FROM DARTMOUTH SQUARE WAS SOLD BY CBRE AGENTS FOR 67 MILLION EUROS JUST WEEKS BEFORE.

PART OF THE BACK GARDEN OF ONE OF THE HOUSES ON THE SQUARE WAS SOLD FOR 700,000 EUROS A FEW YEARS EARLIER.

PUTTING A RESERVE OF 140,000 EUROS ON THIS 2 ACRES OF PRIME LAND WAS NOTHING SHORT OF FRAUD BECAUSE IT WAS BASED ON MISREPRESENTATION OF THE TITLE.

 

EXTRACT FROM ALLSOP'S WEBSITE

Please note that Lot 24 is open to pre-registered bidders only, to register please contact Allsop Space +353(0)1 678 9748.

Prospective purchasers will be required to either deposit cleared funds or provide a banker's draft for €14,000 to 'Allsop Space Ltd'. In return a bidding paddle will be provided. Bids will only be accepted from those in possession of a bidding paddle. If bidding exceeds €140,000 the successful purchaser will be required to provide a cheque or banker's draft to ensure that the deposit equates to 10% of the purchase price. Interested parties should contact the Auctioneers (Ref: RON or DSM) if they have any queries on how to register.

Lot 24 alone was discriminated in this format.

 

 

ON 19TH DECEMBER A MOTION PUT DOWN BY ME IN THE HIGH COURT TO STOP THE SALE GOING ANY FURTHER WAS LISTED BEFORE JUDGE MARY LAFFOY.

OBVIOUSLY IT WAS FUTILE ASKING THIS JUDGE WHO HAD ALREADY VIOLATED MY RIGHTS, TO RECTIFY THEM AND I TOLD HER I WOULD NOT SUBMIT TO ANY HEARING UNDER HER AND ASKED FOR A DIFFERENT JUDGE.AND A JURY TO HEAR THE ALLEGATIONS AND EVIDENCE OF FRAUD THAT MUST BE PUT BEFORE A JURY.

SHE ARRANGED FOR THE HEARING BEFORE JUDGE PETER CHARLETON IN COURT 7 AND WE PROCEEDED THERE ABOUT 11.30 AM. WHEN JUDGE CHARLETON CAME INTO THE COURT I INFORMED HIM THAT I WAS MAKING ALLEGATIONS OF SERIOUS CRIME, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD ME OF MY LAND AND TOLD HIM THAT HE DID NOT HAVE JURISDICTION TO HEAR THE CASE AND IT MUST BE HEARD BY A JURY. HE ASKED ME TO SPEAK TO HIM AND I OUTLINED THE EVIDENCE THAT I HAVE SUMMARISED ABOVE EMPHASISING THAT I WANTED A JURY TO HEAR IT AND THAT HE DID NOT HAVE JURISDICTION TO DEAL WITH THIS CRIME..

THEN HE ASKED MICHAEL O'SULLIVAN BARRISTER FOR TOM MURRAY AND PAUL MEAGHER TO SPEAK AND HE STARTED TO OUTLINE A RAMBLING HISTORY OF THE CASE FROM START TO FINISH FOR ALMOST A FULL HOUR. I TOLD THE JUDGE THAT THIS WAS ALL DIVERSIONARY AND PADDING WHICH HAD NO BEARING ON THE EVIDENCE OF FRAUD THAT I HAD OUTLINED TO HIM.

THEN PETER CHARLETON COMMENCED READING A RAMBLING PREARRANGED WRITTEN JUDGMENT OF THE CASE FAILING TO ADDRESS MY DEMAND FOR A JURY AND MY CLAIM THAT HE DID NOT HAVE JURISDICTION TO HEAR THIS CASE. HE DISMISSED MY EVIDENCE AS IF IT DIDNT EXIST WHILE COLLUDING WITH HIS COLLEAGUES JUDGES LAFFOY AND FINLAY GEOGHEGAN BUT HE FAILED COMPLETELY TO ADDRESS THE EVIDENCE OF CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD, PERJURY AND THE VIOLATION OF MY PROPERTY RIGHTS LEADING TO THE THEFT OF VERY VALUABLE LAND UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE COURT OFFICIALS.

FAR FROM GIVING ME THE PROTECTION OF THE COURTS, HE JOINED IN THE CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD AND ROB ME.

HE ASKED US TO RETURN IN THE AFTERNOON TO HEAR HIS DECISION ABOUT A MOTION PUT DOWN BY MICHAEL O'SULLIVAN TO PREVENT ME TAKING THE MATTER FURTHER AND I RETURNED TO HEAR HIM ORDER ME NOT TO TAKE ANY FURTHER LEGAL STEPS AGAINST THEM AND TO AWARD THEM COSTS.

IT WAS A DISGRACEFUL VIOLATION OF THE SYSTEM OF JUSTICE PERFORMED BY A HIGH COURT JUDGE WHO TO PROTECT HIS FELLOW JUDGES, HAS NOW COLLUDED IN THE CONSPIRACY TO ROB ME OF DARTMOUTH SQUARE AND HE MAKES A MOCKERY OF THE COURTS OF THIS REPUBLIC.

CHARLETON HAD ARRANGED TO HAVE A MEMBER OF THE GARDAI SIT AT THE BACK OF THE COURT AND HE MADE REFERENCE TO CONTEMPT OF COURT A FEW TIMES IN ORDER TO INTIMIDATE ME WHILE I WAS SPEAKING.

 

TO DESCRIBE ANYTHING FALSE IS CRIMINAL

DUE PROCESS OF LAW WAS FLOUTED BY THE JUDGES

THIS IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE

 

NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW

 

THREE HIGH COURT JUDGES, PREJUDICED AGAINST ME AS A LAY LITIGANT, HAVE PERVERTED THE COURSE OF JUSTICE AND REDUCED THE COURTS TO A CHARTER FOR CRIMINALS.

THESE 3 JUDGES LAFFOY, FINLAY GEOGHEGAN AND CHARLETON SHOULD BE STOOD DOWN IMMEDIATELY FOR THE SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC AND IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AS THE EVIDENCE OF THEIR CRIME IS PLAIN TO BE SEEN BY ANY RATIONAL PERSON WHICH IS WHY I DEMANDED A JURY TO DEAL WITH THE EVIDENCE.

SUCH IS THEIR BLINDNESS THAT NOT ONLY DID THEY PROVE TO BE INCAPABLE OF RECOGNISING THE EVIDENCE AS PROOF OF FRAUD BUT THEY TRIED TO PRETEND THAT IT WAS MEANINGLESS AND HAD NO BEARING ON THE SALE.

THIS IS CRIMINAL DELIBERATE PERVERSION FROM HIGHLY PAID PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO ARE EXPECTED TO BE BEYOND REPROACH.

THESE THREE JUDGES COLLUDED TOGETHER TO COMMIT SERIOUS CRIME OF FRAUD AND BY SO DOING THEY HAVE PERVERTED THE COURSE OF JUSTICE, THE HIGH COURTS OF IRELAND AND THE SYSTEM OF JUSTICE ITSELF

 

HAD DARTMOUTH SQUARE BEEN HONESTLY OFFERED FOR SALE WITH THE GATES LOCKED AND WITH VACANT POSSESSION PROMISED TO THE BUYER AND THE TITLE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED, I COULD NOT COMPLAIN.

BECAUSE IT WAS OFFERED FOR SALE WITH THOSE DAMAGING MISREPRESENTATIONS THERE WAS ONLY ONE OUTCOME TO THIS CONSPIRACY BY COURT OFFICERS OVERSEEN BY HIGH COURT JUDGES TO DELIVER IT INTO THE HANDS OF THE COUNCIL AND RESIDENTS AND THEREBY TO DEFRAUD MY COMPANY AND ME OF ITS TRUE VALUE.

HOW COULD ANYBODY TRUST THESE PEOPLE TO HAND DOWN JUSTICE AND THESE PEOPLE ARE ADMINISTERING THE AFFAIRS OF THE STATE AND OVERSEEING THE COUNTLESS BANKRUPT DEVELOPERS AND BANKS ON BEHALF OF THE INNOCENT TAX PAYERS WHO TRUST THEM IN THOSE JOBS.

EVERY DECISION THEY EVER HANDED DOWN MUST NOW BE SUSPECT AND SHOULD BE REVISITED

 

 

CATHY SHERIDAN A REPORTER WITH THE IRISH TIMES AND ONE OTHER JOURNALIST WERE PRESENT AT JUDGE PETER CHARLETON'S KANGAROO COURT HEARING.

 

THEY WERE HANDED COPY OF THE EVIDENCE FROM ME AND HEARD THE WHOLE CASE MAKING NOTES, YET THEY REPORTED A BIASED ACCOUNT SIMPLY STATING CHARLETON'S JUDGMENT WITHOUT REPORTING ANY OF THE ARGUMENTS OR EVIDENCE OF THE FRAUD PUT BEFORE HIM AND OUTLINED ABOVE.

IT SPEAKS VOLUMES ABOUT THE MURDOCH STYLE MEDIA REPORTING IN IRELAND TODAY

 

 

PETER CHARLETON IS THE HATCHET MAN KEPT IN COURT 7 FOR SPECIAL CASES

http://vlps.zymichost.com/uploads/case10zzy.htm

 

 

 

FIRST DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL CLOSED DOWN MY BUSINESS WITH A CPO

THEN THEY HAD ME EVICTED FROM THE PREMISES BY THE SHERRIF

THEN THEY TOOK MY OTHER HOUSE AND SOLD IT UNDER THE DERELICT SITES ACT

THEY DELAYED AND OBSTRUCTED ALL EFFORTS TO PAY MY COMPENSATION FOR THEM

WHEN I ACQUIRED DARTMOUTH SQUARE THEY MADE IT UNUSABLE AND RAN UP HUGE LEGAL BILLS IN THE PROCESS

THEN THEY BROUGHT A PETITION TO WIND UP MY COMPANY.

THREE JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT ASSISTED THEIR LIQUIDATOR TO DEFRAUD ME

THEN THE IRISH TIMES, THE PAPER OF RECORD REPORTED THE CASE TO MISLEAD THEIR READERS AND CONCEAL THE CRIME OF THE JUDGES.

 

 

 

 

 

The Fraternity: Lawyers and Judges in Collusion

http://www.tulanelink.com/tulanelink/johnmolloy_box.htm

AN AMERICAN JUDGE WHO EXPOSED HIS COLLEAGUES PERVERSION OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM

WHICH IS A MIRROR IMAGE OF THE IRISH SYSTEM

 

 

MORE JUDICIAL CORRUPTION WHICH UNDERMINES THE STATE

http://www.judgesabovethelaw.com/

 

NOEL O'GARA'S WEBSITE

CONTACT NOEL O'GARA